January 8th, 2025
"Your most unhappy customers are your greatest source of learning." — Bill Gates
Do you remember the decline of BlackBerry? Yes, the trending phone with small buttons that refused to upgrade to a full-screen-touch smartphone! That is what happens when companies ignore the feedback from their customers and refuse to make necessary upgrades to satisfy new needs.
Let's face it, BlackBerry was poised to be the biggest producer of smartphones but it fell off. The Company touted itself as the ultimate business tool. However, it failed to realize that a phone can be both a business tool and an entertainment hub for its users. By the time the first iPhone and Android devices hit the market, smartphones with full touchscreen functionality had become a staple for the market.
This post will discuss real-world case studies of brands that ignored customer feedback and paid for it.
As of this writing, Netflix's stock price has recovered to over $800. But you won't believe that the entertainment giant's stock price once fell to $53 because it acted without observing its customers' needs.
In 2011, the company announced a two-fold shakeup. It was separating its streaming and DVD-by-mail services and was also introducing Qwikster, a standalone DVD service. This decision, compounded by a 60% price hike in subscription fees, sparked widespread backlash among customers.
Netflix lost approximately 800,000 subscribers by the end of the quarter, which contributed to a severe drop in its stock price. This period revealed the effects of isolating long-standing and new users.
Faced with this fallout, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings issued a stunning public apology. He admitted that he "messed up" and had "slid into arrogance based upon past successes". This unusual apology restored the public's confidence in the brand.
The company built on this momentum retracted the Qwikster plan and set up plans that focused on customer expectations. By studying audience preferences over time, Netflix released House of Cards in 2013, which marked its ability to self-produce premium content.
This gamble on original production reflected the company's responsiveness to customer feedback through innovation, helping it rise once more in a competitive streaming market.
Russ Solomon built this cultural icon for music lovers with the company owning over 200 stores globally also in the late 1990s.
The company took a $110 million loan in 1998 to finance global expansion, a move which triggered future troubles. Shortly after that, CDs became a trend, with retail stores like Best Buy, Target, and Walmart selling at half the price that Tower Records did.
Furthermore, the company's global expansion cost stalled a move into the digital music space which Cool and Apple's iTunes had established.
With low resources and innovations, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2004. It filed again in 2006, liquidating all its assets and closing its stores.
Tower attempted to adapt by launching an online store and holding exclusive in-store performances to draw customers. However, these moves were not enough to compete with the growing convenience and appeal of digital music.
In his final reflections before his passing, Russ Solomon said, "You think you'll be alright, but when it catches up with you, it's too late to do anything about it." This showed how ignoring customer feedback could have an immediate blowback on a company!
The Toys "R" Us Story provides a striking example of how strategic missteps can jeopardize a brand. When the toy store chain began to experience financial difficulties, it signed a 10-year deal to be Amazon's primary toy vendor.
On paper, the deal looked promising as it meant that all its orders would be for the company. But Amazon soon began allowing other toy vendors on its platform, reducing Toys "R" Us's exclusivity.
By 2004, the situation had deteriorated so much so that Toys "R" Us filed a lawsuit against Amazon, seeking to dissolve the agreement. This conflict delayed the company's ability to establish its own e-commerce platform at a time when online retail was gaining traction.
When Toys "R" Us finally recognized the need for a robust online presence, it was already late. In May 2017, the company announced plans to rebuild its website as part of a $100 million, three-year investment in digital transformation—a move many viewed as being far behind competitors.
Four months later in September, the company filed for bankruptcy due to a $5 billion debt and increasing competition from online retailers like Walmart and Amazon. Despite efforts to reinvent itself, the company ultimately liquidated most of its stores in 2018, marking the end of an era.
From the brand stories I shared, you'd notice that they all suffered similar problems from not being responsive to customer feedback. These include:
Other companies that lost revenue include:
"It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." — Warren Buffett
Over the years, customer feedback has been vital in helping companies direct their growth and development. Many companies as highlighted above lose out on long-term profitability because of short-term satisfaction with revenue.
To be a successful company, you must always grow to reflect the needs of your current customer base and the demands of your prospective audience and market.
Ensure to be aware of industry trends and other factors that can contribute to your brand's immediate and future growth.
According to a recent study by PwC, 73% of consumers point to customer experience as an important factor in their purchasing decisions, yet only 49% of U.S. consumers say companies provide a good customer experience today.
Start by examining your own feedback mechanisms:
Remember, the next cautionary case study doesn't have to be yours. The time to listen is now, before it's too late to change course.